Owner: Power Points System URL:http://www.objectiverules.blogspot.com/ Join Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:01:38 -0500 Rating:0 Site Description: A regularly updated blog on Power Points System, College Football, College Basketball, College Sports, Objective Rules, Playoffs, BCS, nonBCS, Bowls and Power Points Standings.
Site statistics:Click here
How Much Do Losses Hurt? 2008-04-11 12:57:00 Listed below are the average regular season losses (ties equal 0.5 losses) for each place in the top 16 under the Power Points System for the past 30 seasons. The information that follows is each place's probable path to the national title under my proposed playoff format (see My College Football Utopia ). The format includes automatic bids for each conference. Therefore, teams that place near the bottom of the top 16 are likely to be bumped by a lower ranked automatic qualifier. Nevertheless, the purpose of this information to is demonstrate the likely cost of each loss in order to counter playoff opponents that argue the regular season will become meaningless due to a greater margin of error for playoff contenders.1-0.5 H16 H8 H4 N22-0.5 H15 H7 H3 N13-1.1 H14 H6 A2 N14-1.2 H13 H5 A1 N25- Read more:Losses
Records and Regular Season Finishes 2008-04-09 11:10:00 Listed below are how various records (based on net wins) fared in the Power Points System's final regular season standings in relation to the top 2, top 4, top 8, top 12, and top 16. The most common record for each net wins total is listed in parentheses. The information that follows indicates the number of teams that finished within the range posted above out of the number of teams that finished with the corresponding net wins.TOP 213 (13-0) 1-112 (12-0) 11-1511 (11-0) 19-3310 (11-1) 15-399 (10-1) 10-968 (10-2) 4-81TOP 413 (13-0) 1-112 (12-0) 15-1511 (11-0) 24-3310 (11-1) 25-399 (10-1) 32-968 (10-2) 17-817 (9-2) 5-1536 (9-3) 0-1195 (8-3) 1-221TOP 813 (13-0) 1-112 (12-0) 15-1511 (11-0) 31-3310 (11-1) 33-399 (10-1) 74-968 (10-2) 44-817 (9-2) 29-1536 (9-3) 9-1195 (8-3) 4-221TOP 1213 (13-0) 1 Read more:Records
, Season
, Regular Season
Arizona versus Arizona State 2008-03-19 02:19:00 Since much has been made of Arizona
making the NCAA tournament while Arizona State
did not despite the latter sweeping two head-to-head games and finishing with better conference and overall records, I wanted to see how these teams compared under the Power Points System. Not surprisingly, the results indicate that this controversy is a phony one and the result of superficial thinking on the part of Arizona State
advocates. Against Division I competition, Arizona won 18 games versus
opponents that won 303 games and lost 14 games versus opponents that lost 125 games. Arizona State won 19 games versus opponents that won 261 games and lost 12 games versus opponents that lost 126 games.OVERALLArizona (18-14) (303 - 125 = 178 Power Points)Arizona State (19-12) (261 - 126 = 135 Power Points)Exclu
BCS and nonBCS Tournament Teams 2008-03-18 01:55:00 Based on the results posted in NCAA Tournament
, listed below are the seeds for BCS and nonBCS teams among their own kind. The numbers to the right are their group seed according to the Power Points System approximation and their actual NCAA seeds respectively. Among BCS schools, only two teams' group seeds (Indiana and Oregon) differ by more than one place. Among nonBCS schools, only five teams' group seeds (Boise State, Belmont, Winthrop, San Diego, and Saint Joseph's) differ by more than one place.BCS TEAMS1 North Carolina 1 12 Tennessee 1 13 UCLA 1 14 Kansas 1 15 Duke 2 26 Texas 2 27 Wisconsin 2 28 Georgetown 2 29 Vanderbilt 3 310 Louisville 3 311 Stanford 3 312 Indiana 3 613 Michigan State 4 414 Connecticut 4 315 Washington State 4 416 Pittsburgh 4 417 Notre Dame 5 418 Marquette 5 519
NCAA Tournament 2008-03-16 19:27:00 If and when all teams play an equal number of games, the Power Points System will produce the same results as simply adding a team's winning percentage and its opponents' winning percentage (including games against). That said, I have added each college basketball team's winning percentage and its opponents' winning percentage (excluding games against) based on information posted at warrennolan.com in order to approximate the field and seedings for the NCAA tournament if the Power Points System were used rather than a selection committee. The Power Points System and the selection committee disagreed on six teams. The Power Points System favored VCU, Illinois State, Stephen F. Austin, Dayton, New Mexico, and IUPUI. The selection committee favored Kansas State, St. Joseph's, Kentucky, Arizon Read more:Tournament
, NCAA Tournament
Mid-Major Champions 2008-03-13 15:18:00 Listed below are the Power Points System's "Mid-Major
" Champions
for the past 30 seasons if the title is awarded to the group's highest ranked member. Listed in parentheses is the group's highest ranked member in the Associated Press Poll and Coaches Poll respectively. If the polls agreed, the result is listed once.1978-Ball State (None and Navy)1979-Brigham Young (Brigham Young)1980-Brigham Young (Brigham Young)1981-Brigham Young (Brigham Young)1982-New Mexico (None)1983-Brigham Young (Brigham Young)1984-Brigham Young (Brigham Young)1985-Air Force (Air Force)1986-San Jose State (None)1987-Eastern Michigan (None)1988-Wyoming (None and Wyoming)1989-Brigham Young (Brigham Young)1990-Brigham Young (Louisville)1991-Bowling Green (East Carolina)1992-Hawaii (Hawaii)1993-Louisville (Louisville)19
No Meetings in 30 FBS Seasons (Part 2) 2008-02-02 14:29:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comListed below are the Top 25 matchups that have not taken place in 30 FBS seasons. The value of each matchup has been determined by combining each pair's 30 season resumes. Each program's position in the 1978-2007 Power Points Standings (Postseason Finale) is listed in parentheses.1-(2)Nebraska vs (5)Ohio State2-(3)Michigan vs (9)Oklahoma3-(4)Miami-Florida vs (8)Southern California4-(1)Florida State vs (14)Texas5-(2)Nebraska vs (12)Georgia6-(3)Michigan vs (12)Georgia7-(4)Miami-Florida vs (12)Georgia8-(6)Florida vs (9)Oklahoma9-(2)Nebraska vs (16)Brigham Young10-(9)Oklahoma vs (10)Tennessee11-(1)Florida State vs (18)Washington12-(6)Florida vs (14)Texas13-(8)Southern California vs (12)Georgia14-(9)Oklahoma vs (12)Georgia15-(6)Florida vs (16)Brigham Young16-(9)Ok Read more:Meetings
No Meetings in 30 FBS Seasons (Part 1) 2008-02-02 13:18:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comListed below are the Top 25 programs according to the 1978-2007 Power Points Standings (Postseason Finale) followed in parentheses by the top four programs each has not played in 30 FBS seasons.1-Florida State (Texas, Washington, Arkansas, and Iowa)2-Nebraska (Ohio State, Georgia, Brigham Young, and Arkansas)3-Michigan (Oklahoma, Georgia, Louisiana State, and Clemson)4-Miami-Florida (Southern California, Georgia, Oregon, and Boise State)5-Ohio State (Nebraska, Virginia Tech, Arkansas, and Boise State)6-Florida (Oklahoma, Texas, Brigham Young, and Clemson)7-Penn State (UCLA, Louisiana State, Virginia Tech, and Arkansas)8-Southern California (Miami-Florida, Georgia, Clemson, and Texas A&M)9-Oklahoma (Michigan, Florida, Tennessee, and Georgia)10-Tennessee (O Read more:Meetings
No Competition Allowed Association 2008-02-01 21:37:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comSince 1978, 181 teams have equaled or surpassed the Power Points System's least valuable resume among top two finishers (1984 Brigham Young) through regular season competition. Only 45 schools account for those 181 teams. Ten schools account for 103. Another 14 schools account for 57 and another 21 schools account for the remaining 21 teams. This means that only 45 schools out of 152 that have played at least one season in the Football Bowl Subdivision have had at least one team that would have made a two-team playoff under the Points Points System in any one of the last 30 seasons and 21 of those had only one team and 14 of those would have only made it in 1984 when the top two bar was set so low. As such, it would appear that the most "meaningful" regular s
1978-2007 Power Points Standings (Part 2) 2008-02-01 20:44:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comPOSTSEASON FINALE1-Florida State 1316.52-Nebraska 1270.53-Michigan 1249.54-Miami-Florida 1203.05-Ohio State 1114.06-Florida 1088.07-Penn State 1063.58-Southern California 1031.09-Oklahoma 1014.510-Tennessee 970.011-Alabama 929.012-Georgia 909.013-Notre Dame 901.014-Texas 884.515-Auburn 853.516-Brigham Young 796.517-UCLA 708.018-Washington 658.019-Louisiana State 607.520-Clemson 600.021-Texas A&M 586.022-Virginia Tech 503.023-Arkansas 467.024-West Virginia 445.525-Arizona State 400.026-Colorado 357.527-Iowa 334.528-Oregon 288.529-Syracuse 251.530-Boise State 224.031-Southern Mississippi 211.032-Wisconsin 209.533-Virginia 189.034-Pittsburgh 181.035-Boston College 172.036-Arizona 157.537-Maryland 150.538-Utah 149.039-North Carolina 148.540-Michigan State 143 Read more:Points
1978-2007 Power Points Standings (Part 1) 2008-02-01 20:39:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comREGULAR SEASON FINALE1-Nebraska 1167.02-Florida State 1150.53-Michigan 1138.54-Miami-Florida 1055.05-Ohio State 1030.56-Florida 995.07-Southern California 936.58-Penn State 935.09-Oklahoma 918.010-Tennessee 853.511-Notre Dame 852.512-Texas 825.013-Alabama 817.014-Georgia 792.015-Brigham Young 776.016-Auburn 763.517-UCLA 652.018-Washington 610.019-Texas A&M 579.020-Clemson 558.021-Louisiana State 538.022-Arkansas 480.023-Virginia Tech 477.524-West Virginia 434.025-Arizona State 391.526-Colorado 351.027-Iowa 316.528-Oregon 281.529-Syracuse 220.530-Southern Mississippi 198.031-Boise State 188.032-Virginia 185.033-Wisconsin 181.534-Pittsburgh 180.535-Arizona 170.036-Michigan State 161.537-Maryland 159.038-Texas Tech 140.539-Boston College 137.540-Utah 133.541 Read more:Points
Highest Ranked One-Loss Teams 2008-01-23 12:36:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comSince 1978, the Power Points System and AP Poll have agreed on the highest ranked one-loss team at the end of the regular season 17 times in 30 seasons. The 13 disagreements are listed below with the team favored by the Power Points System listed first. In each instance, the AP Poll favored the team that lost earlier in the season whereas the Power Points System favored teams that averaged 9.7 more power points. Under ideal circumstances, that amounts to playing opponents that are 9.7 games better combined. Which would you rather reward, scheduling and beating more successful competition or losing first?1978-Southern California (69.5) vs. Alabama (58.0)1979-Arkansas (51.0) vs. Oklahoma (45.0)1981-Pittsburgh (53.0) vs. Georgia (44.5)1985-Oklahoma (52.0) vs. M
Largest Annual Ranking Differences 2008-01-22 12:02:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comListed below are the largest annual differences between a team's final AP Poll ranking and their finish in the Power Points Standings. The numbers in parentheses represent each team's AP and Power Points rankings respectively.1978-Texas A&M (19, 42)1979-Indiana (19, 30)1980-Brigham Young (12, 3)1981-Missouri (19, 25) and Oklahoma (20, 26)1982-Louisiana State (11, 28)1983-East Carolina (20, 39)1984-Iowa (16, 27)1985-Nebraska (11, 19)1986-Auburn (6, 14) and Baylor (12, 20)1987-Arizona State (20, 30)1988-South Carolina (15, 28)1989-Michigan State (16, 23)1990-Brigham Young (22, 9)1991-Oklahoma (16, 26)1992-Hawaii (20, 8)1993-Ohio State (11, 7) and UCLA (18, 14) and Louisville (24, 20)1994-Arizona (20, 28)1995-Toledo (24, 5)1996-Washington (16, 9)1997-Oklahom Read more:Largest
, Annual
, Ranking
Largest Annual Point Differences 2008-01-16 13:36:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comListed below are the largest annual disagreements between the AP Poll and Power Points Standings involving teams that finished in the final AP Poll. Each year lists the largest difference in power points, the teams involved, and their final AP rankings.1978-19.5 Maryland(20) over Texas A&M(19)1979-19.5 Penn State(20) over Indiana(19)1980-17.0 Florida State(5) over Michigan(4)1981-10.5 Nebraska(11) over Washington(10)1982-17.0 Southern California(15) over Louisiana State(11)1983-20.0 Auburn(3) over Miami-Florida(1)1984-12.0 Southern California(10) over UCLA(9)1985-15.5 Alabama(13) over Nebraska(11)1986-25.0 Michigan(8) over Auburn(6)1987-15.5 Notre Dame(17) over South Carolina(15)1988-21.0 Washington State(16) over Georgia(15)1989-18.0 Notre Dame(2) over M Read more:Largest
, Annual
The Hard Road to Just Hot 2008-01-14 12:30:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comPlayoff opponents often argue that a playoff will reward the hottest team rather than the season's strongest team. Besides the fact that most teams qualifying for a 16-team playoff will be 10-2 or better and finish 14-2 or better if they win, the winner of any such playoff is likely to accomplish more in four weeks than most mythical national champions accomplish in an entire season. To illustrate my point, listed below are this year's top 16 teams in the power points standings followed by their path (assuming no upsets but their own) to the national title under the playoff format proposed in My College Football Utopia. The format actually includes auto bids for all conferences. Therefore, readers can substitute the four conference champions not included in t
Power Points System 2008-01-12 11:42:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comTeams place most to least:1-Power Points
(Games Won Opponents' Wins - Games Lost Opponents' Losses)2-Net Wins (Wins - Losses)3-Schedule Strength (Opponents' Power Points)4-Net Points (Points For - Points Against)The college football season is a game. The power points system's purpose is to determine the winners of said game. The winners being those teams that qualify for postseason play. The power points system does not attempt to identify the best team or teams. The first place team is simply the winner of first place according to the prescribed rules. Whether or not the first place team is also the best team is unknowable and irrelevant. Furthermore, the power points system is not predictive. The first place team is not predicted to beat the second pl Read more:System
Top 16 Matches 2008-01-06 21:47:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comListed below are the number of top 16 teams the AP Poll and Power Points Standings agreed on for each year listed followed by the average for all years.1978-131979-121980-141981-131982-131983-151984-111985-151986-131987-131988-141989-151990-141991-131992-131993-151994-131995-141996-151997-131998-141999-142000-142001-132002-142003-132004-152005-152006-152007-14Average13.73
Top 12 Matches 2008-01-06 21:44:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comListed below are the number of top 12 teams the AP Poll and Power Points Standings agreed on for each year listed followed by the average for all years.1978-111979-111980-101981-101982-91983-111984-111985-91986-101987-111988-111989-111990-101991-111992-91993-111994-111995-101996-101997-111998-91999-102000-112001-102002-102003-102004-102005-112006-112007-11Average10.37
Top 8 Matches 2008-01-06 21:40:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comListed below are the number of top 8 teams the AP Poll and Power Points Standings agreed on for each year listed followed by the average for all years.1978-71979-61980-41981-61982-51983-71984-61985-61986-61987-71988-61989-71990-71991-61992-61993-71994-71995-61996-61997-61998-71999-52000-72001-62002-62003-52004-62005-62006-62007-6Average6.13
Top 4 Matches 2008-01-06 21:29:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comListed below are the number of top 4 teams the AP Poll and Power Points Standings agreed on for each year listed followed by the average for all years.1978-31979-21980-21981-11982-31983-31984-41985-21986-31987-31988-21989-31990-41991-41992-41993-31994-21995-41996-31997-41998-21999-32000-32001-32002-32003-32004-32005-42006-32007-2Average2.93
AP Poll Highs and Lows 2007-12-28 13:12:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comThe numbers to the left represent all first through 25th place finishers in the AP poll following bowls. The numbers to the right represent each place's highest and lowest finish respectively in the Power Points Standings since 1978.1-1 & 42-1 & 73-1 & 94-1 & 115-1 & 146-3 & 147-3 & 168-3 & 139-4 & 1810-4 & 1411-5 & 2812-3 & 2913-6 & 2114-9 & 2615-9 & 2816-8 & 3417-10 & 2918-11 & 3119-10 & 4220-8 & 3921-12 & 2922-9 & 3523-12 & 3824-5 & 4725-15 & 43
AP Poll Averages 2007-12-28 12:50:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comThe numbers to the left represent all first through 25th place finishers in the AP poll following bowls. The numbers to the right represent each place's average finish in the Power Points Standings since 1978.1-1.52-2.53-4.04-5.45-5.86-7.37-7.08-7.39-10.410-9.911-12.012-13.813-13.914-15.715-17.216-17.717-17.518-19.619-21.320-23.021-21.622-22.923-23.424-26.525-25.6
2007 Power Points Standings 2007-12-28 02:22:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comREGULAR SEASON FINALE1-Louisiana State 552-Virginia Tech 553-Oklahoma 524-Missouri 515-Ohio State 506-West Virginia 447-Arizona State 438-Kansas 429-Georgia 4010-Boston College 4011-Hawaii 3912-Florida 3913-Southern California 3814-South Florida 3715-Brigham Young 3616-Illinois 3517-Central Florida 3418-Tennessee 3419-Texas 3320-Michigan 3321-Clemson 3322-Oregon 3223-Virginia 2924-Wisconsin 2925-Cincinnati 28POSTSEASON FINALE1-Louisiana State 682-Missouri 583-West Virginia 584-Virginia Tech 565-Georgia 546-Oklahoma 547-Kansas 538-Ohio State 509-Southern California 4810-Boston College 4511-Brigham Young 4412-Texas 4413-Tennessee 4414-Arizona State 4215-Oregon 4216-Michigan 4117-Florida 3918-Hawaii 3819-Cincinnati 3620-South Florida 3521-Illinois 3422-Oregon St Read more:Points
2006 Power Points Standings 2007-12-25 13:47:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comREGULAR SEASON FINALE1-Florida 702-Michigan 673-Ohio State 664-Boise State 565-Louisville 566-Southern California 557-Louisiana State 508-Auburn 499-Oklahoma 4810-Notre Dame 4711-Wisconsin 4212-West Virginia 4213-Rutgers 4214-Virginia Tech 4215-Tennessee 3916-Arkansas 3817-Texas 3818-Wake Forest 3719-Brigham Young 3720-Boston College 3421-California 3322-Oregon State 3123-Texas Christian 2724-Houston 2725-Texas A&M 26POSTSEASON FINALE1-Florida 882-Boise State 713-Louisville 714-Ohio State 685-Michigan 676-Southern California 667-Louisiana State 618-Auburn 599-West Virginia 5310-Wisconsin 5111-Rutgers 5012-Oklahoma 4913-Brigham Young 4514-Notre Dame 4515-Boston College 4516-Texas 4217-California 4118-Virginia Tech 4019-Arkansas 3920-Oregon State 3921-Tenne Read more:Points
2005 Power Points Standings 2007-12-25 13:43:00 Email: scoreboardblog@yahoo.comREGULAR SEASON FINALE1-Southern California 662-Texas 653-Penn State 544-Ohio State 485-Georgia 476-Virginia Tech 467-Texas Christian 428-Oregon 409-West Virginia 4010-Miami-Florida 3611-Louisiana State 3612-Notre Dame 3513-Alabama 3514-Auburn 3315-Florida 3316-UCLA 3117-Wisconsin 3118-Michigan 3019-Oklahoma 3020-Boston College 2721-Texas Tech 2722-Minnesota 2623-Louisville 2524-Northwestern 2525-Georgia Tech 23POSTSEASON FINALE1-Texas 812-Southern California 693-Penn State 624-Virginia Tech 575-Ohio State 576-Texas Christian 507-West Virginia 508-Louisiana State 479-Georgia 4610-Alabama 4311-Oklahoma 4112-UCLA 4013-Florida 3814-Oregon 3715-Wisconsin 3716-Boston College 3717-Miami-Florida 3518-Notre Dame 3319-Auburn 3020-Texas Tech 2821-Michigan 2522-Northwest Read more:Points
College Football Idiots List 2008-04-24 14:01:00 YOU MAKE THE LIST-if you believe polls have any value.-if you believe the Bowl Championship Series is fair.-if you believe the Bowl Championship Series works.-if you believe nonBCS schools should accept the BCS as is just because a large payday is a greater possibility than in years past even if it means their teams and fans are denied any opportunity to compete for the national championship.-if you believe Nebraska should have won the 1997 national title because Tom Osborne is a better coach than Lloyd Carr.-if you believe there is an inherently right winner of the national championship.-if you believe teams favored by Vegas oddsmakers should be ranked higher for that reason.-if you believe the identity of the best team is relevant to determining the winner of a competition.-if you believ Read more:College
, Football
, Idiots
, College Football
One Game Away 2008-04-24 11:21:00 Listed below are the teams during each particular regular season that would have finished in the top two if allowed to change the result of one game only.1978-Southern California, Penn State, and Alabama1979-Brigham Young, Florida State, Arkansas, Southern California, Pittsburgh, Oklahoma, Houston, Nebraska, and Texas1980-Florida State, Pittsburgh, Brigham Young, Notre Dame, North Carolina, Penn State, Southern California, and Baylor1981-Clemson, Pittsburgh, Penn State, Miami-Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Nebraska1982-Georgia, Penn State, Nebraska, and UCLA1983-Auburn, Nebraska, and Texas1984-Florida, Brigham Young, and Washington1985-Penn State, Oklahoma, Florida, Michigan, Iowa, Miami-Florida, Alabama, Brigham Young, and Air Force1986-Penn State, Michigan, Miami-Florida, Louisiana State,
Wins and Regular Season Finishes 2008-04-27 13:08:00 Listed below are how various win totals (ties equal 0.5 wins) fared in the Power Points System's final regular season standings in relation to the top 2, top 4, top 8, top 12, and top 16. The information listed in parentheses indicates the number of teams that finished within the range posted above out of the number of teams that finished with the corresponding win total.TOP 213 (1-2)12 (12-17)11 (30-63)10.5 (1-5)10 (14-136)9.5 (1-30)9 (1-210)TOP 413 (2-2)12 (15-17)11 (44-63)10.5 (2-5)10 (42-136)9.5 (7-30)9 (7-210)8.5 (0-33)8 (1-282)TOP 813 (2-2)12 (16-17)11 (55-63)10.5 (5-5)10 (98-136)9.5 (18-30)9 (37-210)8.5 (5-33)8 (4-282)TOP 1213 (2-2)12 (17-17)11 (61-63)10.5 (5-5)10 (119-136)9.5 (25-30)9 (99-210)8.5 (11-33)8 (17-282)7.5 (2-40)7 (2-350)TOP 1613 (2-2)12 (17-17)11 (63-63)10.5 (5-5)10 (13 Read more:Season
, Regular Season
"Playoff Wins" 2008-04-30 12:27:00 Listed below are the teams that posted at least two top four wins, three top eight wins, and four top 16 wins during the past 30 seasons. The Power Points System's final regular season standings determined all top four, top eight, and top 16 opponents. However, the results below also include bowl games. TOP FOUR WINS1978-Southern California 21982-Penn State 21988-Notre Dame 21989-Notre Dame 21993-Florida State 21997-Florida 22000-Miami-Florida 22005-Texas 22007-Oklahoma 2Five of 35 MNCs won at least two games versus top four competition.TOP EIGHT WINS1978-Southern California 31987-Miami-Florida 31987-Florida State 31988-Notre Dame 31990-Colorado 31997-Florida 32000-Oklahoma 32000-Miami-Florida 3Five of 35 MNCs won at least three games versus top eight competition.TOP 16 WINS1988-Miami-Fl
Losses and Regular Season Finishes 2008-05-06 11:42:00 The information posted below indicates how many teams (listed in parentheses) with the various loss totals (ties equal 0.5 losses) finished in the Power Points System's top 2, top 4, top 8, top 12, and top 16 through regular season competition during the past 30 seasons.TOP 20 (34)1 (21)1.5 (2)2 (3)TOP 40 (45)0.5 (1)1 (48)1.5 (8)2 (17)3 (1)TOP 80 (54)0.5 (5)1 (93)1.5 (18)2 (55)2.5 (5)3 (10)TOP 120 (57)0.5 (5)1 (115)1.5 (28)2 (117)2.5 (8)3 (26)3.5 (2)4 (2)TOP 160 (57)0.5 (6)1 (123)1.5 (29)2 (170)2.5 (13)3 (66)3.5 (6)4 (10) Read more:Losses
, Season
, Regular Season
Recommend Site To A Friend
