Dear Readers,Recently there was an anonymous comment at my “Best of 2006” post which reads as below:“Hey,now a days your blog has become self-centered. You are always writing about your previous posts and statistics. Are you running out of ideas or what?”A very valid observation indeed and I could sense the concern. Regular visitors of this blog would have noticed the changes-I’ve been extensively interlinking posts, the side-bar has undergone lots of change and primarily includes links to my other posts and have written few posts of late patting my own back, boasting about site statistics, previous posts or how a post is topping the world in search engine queries.What is happening? Has eNidhi India CBO gone mad? Or has he run out of fresh content and just recycling old contents? Has creativity died and no new ideas are left in his head?After reading earlier said comment I felt it warrants a new post to explain my regular readers about the reason behind above said changes and
Could a blogger not be interested in Encyclocenter?I very much doubt it.An Encyclopedia is the place where you can find the world in articles.If you click on Writing you will be able to read everything about The Grolier Club.This, for example is my favorite.I am very fond of graphic arts and this club's objective is "the literary study and promotion of the arts pertaining to the production of books." The founder, Jean Grolier is a Renaissance Collector.Could an Italian not be interested in him?But this website is the collection of articles about almost everything, from Auto and trucks to Food, Humor, Religion, Women and Men, everything you can be interested in...And if you lack ideas for your posts, this is a real treasure... This is a sponsored post, please read disclosure policy. Think and you'll have the problem of disposal of ideas...
http://www.2rss.com/atom2rss.php?atom=http%3A//woip.blogspot.com/atom.xml
The trouble with having time off work and nothing much to do with it is that my mind tends to fixate on things and go over them repeatedly, which can get frustrating. GBF calls it looping. Yesterday I was fixating on why it is that I seem to be shaggable but not date-able. Previous history indicates that I can get the guy for an evening/night, but that I don't then hear from them again. In some instances this is not a problem, in others (see the CG saga for an example) it is - because it gets irritating when a guy gives the impression that he is interested in more of an actual relationship when it turns out that this is probably more about ensuring the availability of a shag at a conference. As I said to GBF last night, I would quite like to be thought of as date-able for a change. Or rather, I would like to be both shaggable and date-able. Is that really such a lot to ask?GBF, L and I went out for a few drinks last night, which was fun. I was about ready for some social time,
Iran's nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani said Wednesday that he expected new ideas from EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana on breaking the standoff over Tehran's disputed nuclear program. Larijani and Solana met in the Turkish capital Ankara to try and seek a way through the crisis sparked by Iran's defiance of US Security Council demands to halt uranium enrichment.
Iran denies US and EU
“If new ideas are the lifeblood of any thriving organization ... managers must learn to revere, not merely tolerate, the people who come up with the ideas.”Mark McCormack (1930 – 2003) U.S. founder and chairman of the International Management Group
*DISCLAIMER* This isn't exactly a new idea in this opening. To my knowledge Alfonso Romero (who i believe was a GM) was the first to explore this opening and write an article about it in a Spanish magazine in 1998, and a more in depth article in the New In Chess Yearbook #54 in 2000. (I had access to neither of these) I am merely expanding on what i could find of his original theory, using some top level games played since and ideas of my own.*
I already know what you are thinking, "but I don't want to play the Petrov's, its toodrawish." When you are white, and black starts out on that ever-familiar path, try moaning to him that you don't want to play this opening, see how far it gets you J. Or, you can learn some lines here that may very well keep you from drawing, and not having to worry about drawing in this opening again. We all know how the Petrov's starts out: 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 and there are some alternatives here, but I'm not going to get into those, I'm here for anot
