MoveOn

MoveOn.org is offering the new, "Yes We Did" Barack Obama poster by well known artist Shepard Fairey as part of a great deal.Last week they offered a limited edition run for $80 donations. Now they are offering the regular edition posters for donations of only $20, not a bad deal at all.Plus, your donation goes to help support Barack Obama and get more Democrats elected in run off contests in the

Pour inciter les électeurs démocrates à se déplacer en nombre, MoveOn.org a créé une vidéo virale personnalisable avec le nom de la personne à qui vous décidez de l’envoyer, dont l’idée est de montrer que n’importe qui peut faire la différence, tout en faisant culpabiliser ceux qui hésiteraient à se rendre aux urnes… Démonstration : Pour [...]

New MoveOn.Org Video AdAnd Parodymoveon.org, attack, ad, drilling, america, oil, parodyConservative PunkThe MoveOn.Org Attack DogThe latest passive toned ad from Moveon.org, this time tackling the energy crisis and offshore drilling:The Wilkow Majority decided it's parody time. This was a record turnaround too. Enjoy!The parody of the attack ad is here: Parody of MoveOn.org attack adby RizzutoSour

WASHINGTON (AP) — A major labor union and the liberal organization MoveOn.org are joining forces to air a provocative new ad portraying John McCain’s Iraq policy as a prolonged presence that would involve a new generation of Americans…. Related posts No related posts.

MoveOn.Org a large "California" based progressive organization has yet to take a stand on the marriage amendment slated for the upcoming election. I personally have unsubscribed from MoveOn's email list months ago because I never see them take any actions on LGBT issues and I find that disturbing.MoveOn.org is now taking feedback on where their focus should be going fwd, please let them know LGBT

Wow. What can I say about this ad? You know it's a lie. McCain should demand a denunciation from Obama whom Moveon endorsed. Or, maybe, McCain is waiting for the general election to hang Moveon.org around Obama's neck. Powered by b2evolution.

Influential right-wing conservative pastor John Hagee has endorsed John McCain for president, the mainstream media has ignored the controversial and radical comments by this leader. Pastor Hagee has said hurricane Katrina was God's punishment for an upcoming gay pride parade that was scheduled. He has made bigoted comments against the Catholic church as well. Moveon.org is protesting John McCain's visit to Louisiana today and calling on him to speak out against these anti-gay, bigoted viewpoints. Please sign the MoveOn petition and hold John McCain accountable for his allegiance to this homophobe Video of his hateful rhetoric:

Wow, Hillary admitting on tape that it’s the Far-left Democrats and MoveOn.org that has contributed to her possible defeat. hattip: Gateway Pundit ---Related Articles at Infidels Are Cool:Trailer: Hillary the MovieThe Shocking Video Hillary Does NOT Want You To See!Google bans anti-MoveOn.org adsVideo: Hillary calls Cheney Darth Vader

Hillary's attack on the hard left base of her party is very significant: "We have been less successful in caucuses because it brings out the activist base of the Democratic Party. MoveOn didn't even want us to go into...

From the people that brought you this tasteless crap ad! Yes, it’s true. The left-wing anti-patriots at MoveOn.org, who didn’t think twice about handing jihadists potent ammunition the day before the sixth anniversary of 9/11 with their despicable attack on Gen. Petraeus, are now worried about actions that “hurt the country.”Dangerous, perilous, damaging, harmful actions…like having [...]

Endless war on the installment plan

 It is amazing to me how scared liberals are of the other side’s opinions. Why are they so afraid of debate? Could it be that they know they can’t win a debate, so instead they try to de-legitimize the other side? I am referring to moveon.org and their recent demonstration against Fox News. About 22 demonstrators gathered [...]

Moveon.org is having its fringe base vote on one of the following four ads to be aired on television in the coming months. You would think that these ads came directly from our Nation's Indoctrination Universities. Below I have posted the videos and a link to a rebuttal. My Rebuttal: 1) Social Security uses the payroll tax to pay for the system, which harms the poor. 2) Conservatives... Click the Headline Link to Visit Copious Dissent and Read the Full Story.

I received another Moveon.org email this week. As usual, the email contained lies, damned lies, and no statistics to back up its assertions. It focused on the Alternative Minimum Tax and the Capital Gains Tax. Because the Alternative Minimum Tax, a tax created by liberal Democrats, is now harming the middleclass, the Democrats want to repeal it. Go figure! But, of course the Democrats cannot... Click the Headline Link to Visit Copious Dissent and Read the Full Story.

The proliferation of mainstream media old timers like the New York Times that are trying to jump on the blogging bandwagon (at the same time they are trashing it) is intriguing. Nevertheless, the topic at hand is equally intriguing. The left is no stranger to intentionally skewing poll results, in this case skewing poll results to get the polling questions they want, to suit their agenda. I have seen posts at DU many times to ”DU This Poll” meaning to flood it with votes to skew the results in the direction they want. Then in an amazing feat of doublethink, they point to the skewed poll results as proof of their original proposition. Such mental gymnastics are worthy of an Olympic sport unto itself. Keep in mind that MoveOn.org are those same fine people *cough, cough* that ran a full page ad trashing General Petraeus calling him “General Betrayus”. I once heard the MoveOn crowd described as an unending parade of filth and villainy.  Pretty accurate all in all I’d say. ~RJH New Y

I just received another email from Moveon.org. According to Moveon.org, not only will the Republicans lose votes if they uphold President Bush's SCHIP veto tomorrow, but children are going to die.Yes, children are going to die who cannot afford healthcare, but for the SCHIP program. So, according to Moveon.org, I can save these poor children by contributing $25 to pay for an advertisement telling the story of a young sick child. The total advertisement should cost $200,000. According to Moveon, this young girl would be dead today if it were not for Big Government. How about I pay them $25 for someone to teach these people economics?Nevertheless, this does beg the question, "Why can't Moveon.org just tell me which kids need my help so I can donate $25 to the needy families directly?" The answer is because this is not about needy families. It is not about the children. It is not about healthcare. It is about their power, their control, and their contempt for the rest of us. H

I spoke with Rush Limbaugh on Friday regarding my email from Moveon.org. Moveon.org wanted me to start a candlelight vigil for the SCHIP program. They blatantly lied to their constituents about the nature of this massive government entitlement; it is not intended to help poor children at all.Even worse, Moveon.org asserted that Rush Limbaugh "Swift Boated a 12-year old." It was just a propaganda email, which demonstrates how pathetic these Left-wing organizations are. However, what I just saw during an MSNBC commercial was beyond the pale.In a promotion for Countdown with Keith Olbermann on MSNBC this week, the question was posed, "Did the Right Swift Boat a 12-year old?" This is clear evidence that Keith Olbermann received the same email that I did, subscribes to Moveon.org, and takes marching orders from Moveon.org and Media Matters. This is no longer about journalism, or even punditry, it is about Liberals' control of the MSM.Related EditorialsI Just Got Off the Phone With Ru

Folks, I just got off the phone with Rush Limbaugh regarding this email from Moveon.org. I subscribe to them so I can stay one-step ahead of them. They cannot be allowed to get control of this Country. Below you can see how they distort the SCHIP program in order to seek political gain. They even used a 12-year-old to lie for them. They have total contempt for their own subscribers; it is obnoxious. God help us if Hillary Clinton is our next President.When our kids get sick, having health insurance can mean the difference between life and death. Next week, Congress will decide which fate awaits poor children across America, when they consider whether to override President Bush's veto of kids' health care.1To win, we only need 15 more Republicans to switch sides—and the best way to make that happen is with nationwide outcry. So, on Tuesday night, we'll gather at candlelight vigils for the millions of U.S. children who won't get health care if the Republicans block the bill.Can you

Well, you knew it was coming: Sen. Collins is now using the Petraeus ad flap as part of a fundraising pitch.It's entirely fair game, although one of the Collins camp's central charges is misleading: That "MoveOn.org has contributed more money to her opponent than all of the presidential candidates combined, $250,000 already."Phrasing it that way conjures up images of a (nefarious) left-wing behemoth dumping a giant check on Rep. Allen.But that hasn't happened--at least as far as I know. Instead, hundreds (thousands?) of individuals have responded to Moveon.org solicitations by making mostly small dollar donations to Allen's campaign.So they're the ones doing the giving. Moveon is just using their megaphone--and their web platform--to draw attention to the race.It's a subtle distinction, especially if you don't follow these types of things closely. But it's an important one. And it's why the National Republican Senatorial Committee, for example, has been careful to characterize

The last few days have seen what can be considered nothing other then a coordinated effort by the gals over at PMSNBC and the Clinton News Network to attack Fox News, Bill O'Reilly et al. This is a serious and concerted effort to silence and discredit conservative opinion makers. These people care not for the facts, or who they are harming, so long as they achieve their goal. It does not matter that facts and reality do not back up their story. One CNN commentator went so far as to call NPR's Juan Williams a "negro" and "Bill O'Reilly's Puppet." Now anyone who has seen Juan Williams commentary would know just how far from the truth this is. I guess stating the fact that "40% of black children our born without a father" makes him a Right-Winged fascist.With Media Matters, Moveon.org, MSNBC, CNN and the Democrat Party working in concert with one another, this smear campaign just may work. It is difficult for conservatives to respond because there is simply no such apparatus to respon

RNC: Bill Clinton supporting MoveOn for 'political payback'

Pelosi And ReidAre Trying Really Hard ToAppease The Right Wing The Results Are InCongress Fiddles, Iraq BurnsDemoralizing Move On Dot Org HasSpine, They Get My DonationNot The D L C Or Any Other LameOrganization That DareDenounce Our Free Speech Right wing hypocrites and spineless Democrats need a reminder (via Move.org): They didn't condemn Vice President Cheney when he falsely connected Al Qaeda to Saddam Hussein.They didn't condemn Colin Powell when he lied about WMD to the United Nations.They didn't condemn President Bush when he started eavesdropping on American citizens without a warrant.They didn't condemn President Bush and the Republicans when they attacked Sen. John Kerry's war record.They didn't condemn Sen. Saxby Chambliss when he ran ads comparing triple-amputee and war hero Max Cleland to Osama bin Laden.They still haven't done enough to slow this dreadful war or protect our troops. 1. "Al Qaeda-Hussein Link Is Dismissed," The Washington Post, June 16, 2004http://w

The Democrats just lost the 2008 election. They will not be able to overcome the Far-Left’s insanity. Stick a fork in them; they are done.If it was not bad enough that Moveon.org attacked 4-star General Petraeus, calling him ‘General Betray Us,’ Moveon.org has continued their disgraceful antics over the last few weeks. Consequently, many Democrats, including Hillary Clinton, were forced to take the indefensible position of siding against those who are trying to secure Iraq.We have heard from an unnamed insider that the Democrats in Congress are furious over the Moveon.org ad. While many Democrats really believe that the War in Iraq is wrong, some of them are actually patriotic Americans who support General Petraeus, Jim Webb comes to mind. But, Moveon.org has taken over the Party, contributing more money than the NRA, and the Democrats are powerless to stop them.Now let us go forward one week. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is invited to speak at Columbia University. Lee Bollinger, b

  In a stunning admission of error, the New York Times has admitted that it should not have given moveon.org a substantial price break to run their General Betray Us ad. In a column entitled, “Betraying Its Own Best Interests,” New York Times Public Editor (ombudsman) Clark Hoyt wrote that the newspaper, in running the MoveOn.org ad for the “standby rate” of $64,575, violated its own written standards. “I think the ad violated The Times’s own written standards, and the paper now says that the advertiser got a price break it was not entitled to,” Hoyt wrote.   But, after all, this was too good for the NYT to resist. A radical left wing group who echos the Times ideology, it was just too good to pass up. They don’t regret getting moveon.org’s ad out there at a bargain basement price, they only regret that the cat was let out of the bag and they were caught with their ideological pants down.   Now it’s spin control, and moveon

NY Times admits it erred on MoveOn ad

Moveon.org has continued to bring the Democratic Party lower and lower into the abyss. While many Americans disagree with the War in Iraq, none of them want to see an organization that donates more to politicians than the NRA call a General a traitor.Instead of apologizing for calling General Petraeus 'General Betray Us' in a full-page New York Times ad, Movon.org is claiming that the United States' Senate is silencing their speech. No, the United State's Senate condemned Moveon.org's disgraceful comments, but in no way shape or form banned Moveon.org from speaking.Ironically, there is no doubt that FDR would have thrown all the members of Moveon.org in jail and had them tried for treason. He then would have shut down the New York Times.Now Moveon.org is having its lunatic members sign petitions telling their Senators and Representatives that they will continue to trash the General until the Iraq War is over.Well, here is what I did, and I encourage you to do as well: Moveon.o

The ombudsman for The New York Times has responded to the controversy over the MoveOn ad. There have been two major issues–whether MoveOn unfairly received a price break for ideological reasons and whether an ad using language such as “General Betray Us” should have been run at all. The answer to the first question remains murky. Clark Hoyt, the ombudsman for The New York Times writes that “the paper now says that the advertiser got a price break it was not entitled to.” Later in the article the following explanation is provided: MoveOn.org paid what is known in the newspaper industry as a standby rate of $64,575 that it should not have received under Times policies. The group should have paid $142,083. The Times had maintained for a week that the standby rate was appropriate, but a company spokeswoman told me late Thursday afternoon that an advertising sales representative made a mistake… Eli Pariser, the executive director of MoveOn.org, told me t

Once again the media, in this case the New York Times, has been caught with it’s hand in the political cookie jar. For two weeks they have been defending their actions of not only running a despicable ad for the liberal activist group MoveOn.org but also giving them a huge discount on the cost of the ad. Later when Rudy Giuliani was given the same rate to run a counter ad the left pointed to that as proof of what the New York Times has been claiming. Obviously, they had to give Giuliani the same rate after being caught. I think thats too subtle for some on the left to understand though. However, after two weeks of denials it seems like at the very least the Times violated its own rules and at the worst are, once again, willing accomplices to the left in smearing conservatives. What a shocker. Eli Pariser, the executive director of MoveOn.org, told me that his group called The Times on the Friday before Petraeus’s appearance on Capitol Hill and asked for a rush ad in Monday’s paper.

Proving there is no such thing as bad publicity, after President Bush called out MoveOn.org's ads as "disgusting," the group raked in $500,000 in donations in a single day.read more | digg story

I don't know, maybe it's time to just round up the Democrats and shoot them. One thing we know, they wouldn't put up much of a fight.Just a few days ago I talked about how they had betrayed the people who elected them with their lies, pork barrel agenda, and failure to keep the promise to end the Iraq War.And it probably is not nice to pick on a bunch of hopeless losers. But this week they were back at it.You heard about the Move.on.org ad on General Patreaus. They spent a million dollars plus on a full page ad in the New York Times calling him General Betray Us. Now those guys should be shot simply on the basis of really bad punmanship.I personally have no use for MoveOn. They are a left wing socialist cadre of Internet whiners. But, they have become a financial powerhouse in the Democratic Party.I also think their ad was in poor taste. But no more so than when George Bush made John Mcain's daughter cry by announcing during the South Carolina primary campaign that she was the

Questa è una notizia interessante. Al sito MoveOn.org (spesso decantato da un noto comico genovese molto di moda in quest'ultimo periodo) è stato approvato un emendamento di condanna dal Senato statunitense con una votazione a dir poco inequivocabile: 75 a 25. Perchè? Molto semplicemente a causa di una pagina (oserei definire "fuori luogo" e non mi spingo oltre) acquistata, per la data del 10

This “explanation” from Barack Obama sounds weak at best. I think he was just playing it safe thinking that people will forget him not voting much sooner than they would forget him voting a way they did not like. ~RJH ABC Blogs article link  Obama Explains Why He Didn’t Vote on MoveOn Ad September 20, 2007 8:08 PMABC News' Jonathan Greenberger Reports: When the U.S. Senate voted earlier today on a resolution denouncing the liberal organization MoveOn.org for its recent advertisement referring to Gen. David Petraeus as "General Betray Us," Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill., was notably absent.He was in Washington – he canceled a planned town hall forum in Rock Hill, SC, specifically so he could vote on a series of Iraq-related measures – but when the MoveOn resolution came up, Obama was nowhere to be seen.Tonight, at a fundraiser in Atlanta, Obama explained why."The notion that we’re wasting time debating about a newspaper ad makes no sense. So I just, I didn’t even vote

Things are beginning to get dirty......and it's all brought to us by the same people who lost the last election...duh!

Dude, you're EVERYONE'S worst nightmare

UPDATE: MoveOn.org changed its Advertisement from 'betray us' to 'betrayal of trust;' this time referring to George Bush instead of General Petraeus. It appears that by attacking Petraeus, they have severely overplayed their hand. Now they will attempt to divert attention to George Bush, who is a much easier target for the people with Bush Derangement Syndrome ("BDS"). This will not work, however. Once you throw the skunk into the American People's homes, you can't get the stink out.Start of original editorial.In typical John Edwards fashion, Edwards is having his wife fight his battles for him. This has allowed him to take both sides on every issue because he can stay silent while his wife does the dirty work for him. He pulled this same nonsense before on the issue of gay marriage; his wife supports it, while he does not. This time, however, Elizabeth Edwards denounced Moveon.org and their shameful attack on General Petraeus. John Edwards is a pathetic excuse for a lea

John McCain lashed out angrily against moveon.org in Hudson, New Hampshire, carrying a laminated copy of the advertisement: "It’s disgraceful, it’s got to be retracted and condemned by the Democrats, and MoveOn.org ought to be thrown out of this country.”Interestingly enough, one of the only Democrats connected to the presidential election to speak out about the ad was Elizabeth Edwards in Des Moines, Iowa, after one of her husband's campaign stops: "Someone who’s spent their life in the military doesn’t deserve ‘General Betray Us,’” she said in an interview. Her father was a naval officer, and she grew up on Naval bases, she explained.It's too bad moveon.org is getting all this attention for their tasteless ad, since any publicity is good publicity.

Hat tip to Politico for posting this video of the Rudy Giuliani ad linking Hillary Clinton to the MoveOn.org ad attacking General Petraeus. ~RJH

So the New York Times gave MoveOn.org over 50% off the standard rate for their full page ad vilifying General Petraeus. Well anyone that’s shocked about the long standing bias of the New York Times stand on your head…. Now would one of you lefties like to tell me about the conservative bias of the media? This is where the left starts screaming at the top of their lungs about Fox News. But them having ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, PBS, CNN etc in their back pocket does not count. When a Democrat starts whining about the “conservative bias” of the media that just means the media in question is not left leaning enough to suit them. ~RJH Yahoo news article link  NY Times criticized for ad attacking PetraeusBy Claudia Parsons Thu Sep 13, 4:00 PM ET An ad criticizing the top U.S. general in Iraq raised charges on Thursday that The New York Times slashed its advertising rates for political reasons -- an accusation denied by the paper.The ad by liberal anti-war group moveon.org ran on Monday, the d

In an interesting and clever campaign move, Rudy Giuliani has decided to place his own ad in the New York Times, asking them to allow him to pay the same discounted advertisement rates that moveon.org paid. The ad quotes Hillary Clinton at the top of the page and chastizes her for not denouncing the moveon.org ad and for her comments to General Petraeus, in which she claimed his progress report on Iraq required "willing suspension of disbelief."The ad goes on to cite Petraeus's impressive military record. The ad states a question: "Who should America listen to...A decorated soldier's commitment to defending America, or Hillary Clinton's committment to defending MoveOn.org?" The ad ends with a quote from Giuliani: "These times call for statesmanship, not politicians spewing political venom."Giuliani obviously sees Clinton as the Democrat frontrunner, and therefore who he would be up against if he wins the primary, which explains why he's not attacking the other Democrats who spoke u

Following a week of backlash and criticism, MoveOn.org decided to return the tattered copy of the Republican playbook that they had recently found sitting on a local park bench.MoveOn recently called the loyalties of several Democrats into question calling them DINOs, which is short for “Democrats In Name Only.” They followed it up with a challenge to the patriotism of General Petraeus in the New York Times with a full page ad that read, “General Petraeus or General Betray Us?” Both of these techniques came from chapters in the Republican playbook they found.“We really have learned our lesson,” said MoveOn spokesman Trevor Fitzgibbon, “We just aren’t very good at infighting and questioning someone’s patriotism. Give us conspiracy theories and triumph of the human spirit, those guys can keep the other stuff.”MoveOn plans on returning to their traditional roots of donating money to Democratic candidates and emailing controversial videos to their members.“Fortunately

There's been no shortage of doubters of the veracity of Gen. Petraeus's testimony to Congress in prominent news sources recently. However, moveon.org paid for this appallingly tasteless ad in the New York Times in a move that may cost them supporters, even among liberals.I wouldn't call myself a Democrat by name, but I consider myself to be fairly liberal. However, this ad is a huge turnoff to me. Whatever accusations Democrats are making about the politics of this testimony are certainly fair to bring up, but is it fair to assassinate this man's character so disrespectfully when none of these people have any actual idea what's going on in Iraq, and he's spent a great deal of time there?I'm certainly not buying into the victorious claims that the "surge" is working, but I wonder, for the sake of being the devil's advocate, what is in it for Petraeus to claim that it is? Whatever his political leanings are, I don't see what benefit he could possibly gain from making entirely

MoveOn.org, in its usual childish fashion, ran a full-page ad in the New York Times slamming General Petraeus on the day of his testimony before Congress. Attempting to portray the general as betraying America the hard left wing activist group been managed to even earn the ire of Senator Harry Reid who is normally a regular bootlicker of said group. I would surmise that Reid is afraid of the well deserved anger towards MoveOn.org from the voters on both sides of the aisle. Reid knows that the Democrats majority in the Senate and Congress is razor thin and ham fisted stunts like this by MoveOn.org could very well endanger that slim majority. Later tonight I will do some dumpster diving at the usual moonbat hangouts to see what their reaction to this is. I expect it will be the usual childish temper tantrums anytime their Democrat lapdogs dare disagree with them. ~RJH HotAir article link Update: Reid heads for the lifeboatsSenate Majority Leader Harry Reid expressed frustration Monday

  According to this article moveon.org may be beginning to turn on the Democrats that aren’t anti-war enough. Rep. Brian Baird’s (D-Wash.)  just returned from Iraq and he has changed his position. Baird recently returned from a trip to Iraq and reversed his position on a withdrawal timetable, citing military progress in the four-year-old war. MoveOn is calling the move a “flip-flop” and says it goes against the views of his constituents.   Baird goes to Iraq and sees the progress that the mainstream media fails to report. After seeing the successes we have recently been having over there he changes his tune on the timetable for surrender. This is something that the far left cannot have so they immediately target him even though he has been on their side. Moveon.org has too much invested in us losing in Iraq to actually want us to win there, so they have to attack anyone who may have a differing opinion. Even someone who has been there and seen first hand the progress w

  Let me say once again that this program was not, and is not, a domestic spying program in the first place, but that is the way it has been presented to the American people, so it is the term I will continue to use.   Last week the president signed a bill passed by the house and the senate that continues the foreign surveillance program. For my take on this you can read this. The quick version of my take is, if the Democrats were elected on a mandate, and if the president was spying on innocent Americans, they would never have passed this bill.   Now the ultra-liberal group, MoveOn.org is slamming the Democrats. (more…)

 MoveOn.org has found it’s latest target. They will be going after Fox News. What is the best way to go after a media outlet? By going after the advertisers on that outlet. Take away the money and you take away the outlet. MoveOn.org, the Campaign for America’s Future and liberal blogs like DailyKos.com are asking thousands of supporters to monitor who is advertising on the network. Once a database is gathered, an organized phone-calling campaign will begin, said Jim Gilliam, vice president of media strategy for Brave New Films, a company that has made anti-Fox videos.   You may wonder if such censorship could have legs. (more…)

This is quite the interesting article in spite of a few slams at Fox news Channel. The irony of the New York Times saying another news outlet might be biased is delicious. But all in all its still a good read. It points out some very telling things about the Democrat candidates. It shows that they put appearances and political correctness above actual results and positive outcomes. Wow, I'm sure shocked. Fox was the only network to make a suitable offer to the Black Caucus for hosting the Democrat debates and they also instituted some internship and viewership programs within the black and Hispanic community. But the major Democrat candidates are all too eager to turn their back on that. Why? Because the nutroots at MoveOn.org has given them their marching orders and like the good lil’ lapdogs they are they followed their orders. So it could possibly cost the minority communities some very much needed programs and why are they doing it? Because MoveOn.org will throw a hissy fit like

This doesn’t mean much but is interesting anyways. Hillary finished fourth in a straw poll held by moveon.org. Obama finished first, followed by Edwards and Kusinich. This is interesting because the presumed front-runner appears to be struggling. Moveon.org is a powerful part of the left wing. They may be ultra left wing fringe players, but that is who the Democrat candidates have been playing to. If Hilary can do no better than fourth with this group it may not look so good for Mrs. Clinton. Moveon.org is very well funded and if they use this and future polls to endorse a Democrat candidate, Mrs. Clinton will have to move even further left to satisfy this group.

YouTube Video: MOVEON TOWNHALL: IRAQ - Highlightshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ojGDd-mi_0Alex

Reposted from Redstate. ~RJHRedstate article link Moveon.org tells Clinton and Obama to sit, then roll over, then play dead. By smagar Promoted from blogs, with an observation: yes, the Congressional Black Caucus is expected to roll over and play dead for this one. And you'll notice that nobody - myself, smagar, Captain Ed, the Easter Bunny - is really expecting them not to. Which is sad, but then, if they showed more signs of independence calculated insults like this wouldn't happen to them. - Moe LaneGee...I wonder who wears the pants in the Democratic Party?Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.) yesterday joined former North Carolina senator John Edwards (D) in deciding to skip a debate scheduled for September that Fox News is co-sponsoring with the Congressional Black Caucus.Liberal activists, particularly the online group Moveon.org, have called for Democratic presidential candidates not to participate in debates by Fox, which they say is biased against

MoveOn.org Political Action’s first online candidate forumExcerpt:"U.S. Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., will be among seven presidential candidates participating in MoveOn.org Political Action’s first online candidate forum, called a “virtual town hall.”The candidates, also including Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama and Rep. Dennis Kucinich, former Sen. John Edwards and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, will discuss their positions on Iraq and respond to questions from MoveOn members at 7 p.m. April 10. Sen. Chris Dodd also may participate."http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=200770405058Alex

Its hilarious how the left is so intolerant they can't stand a single news outlet that even slightly disagrees with them. And when you consider that they have ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN etc etc why are they so afraid of Fox? What it really comes down to is they are not tolerant of diverse opinions. They only want to hear an echo chamber of agreeing voices. Take a look at Daily Kos & Democratic Underground if you have the stomach for it. A larger more voiciferous collection of nutroots you will not find and any other two sites. Their anger at Roger Ailes is laughable when you consider that they have 99.999% of the Hollywood establishment drinking their Kool Aid. A single comment from one man and they are stifling debate obver it? More like just looking for any excuse as they know they have no ideas and no real platform. Personally I think that the Democrat party intended all along to find some reason to dump Fox. I think they had that in mind before they agreed to the debate. The self d